Peter Jackson‘s King Kong (2005) is the third re-imagining of the classic story, first told in 1933, 1976 and now 2005, that continues to follow the same story, but adding a wonderful sense adventure, more substance, and terrific visual effects. Peter Jackson’s expansive remake of the 1933 classic follows director Carl Denham (Jack Black) and his crew on a journey from New York City to the ominous Skull Island to film a new movie. Accompanying him are playwright Jack Driscoll (Adrien Brody) and actress Ann Darrow (Naomi Watts), who is whisked away by the monstrous ape, Kong, after they reach the island. The crew encounters dinosaurs and other creatures as they race to rescue Ann, while the actress forms a bond with her simian captor.
We live in an era in which virtually every classic of cinema is being remade, and King Kong was originally a surprise hit for RKO studios back in 1933, the heart of the depression. However, Peter Jackson’s brings us back to the 1930s setting that was the original picture’s present day. In so doing, he gives the story a little of the relevance it once had in its era, whilst simultaneously recreating it as a nostalgic period piece.
The 2005 King Kong is also a far longer movie than either of its predecessors. This extra time is not really used to augment the plot, which is more or less identical to what it was in 1933. Instead, it’s used to augment the characters. While the ship’s crew of the first movie were nameless dots getting picked off one-by-one by various claymation monsters, here they are real human beings with personalities and backstories. What’s more, the character of the eponymous ape is fleshed out too, his mix of savagery, tenderness, and near-humanity gave a complex and moving arc. Kudos here also goes to the motion-capture acting of Andy Serkis and the animation team who have done a fantastic job of creating an animal with emotional depth.
The profundity of the screenplay is exemplified in a scene, intercut with the arrival on Skull Island, where Jamie Bell says of the Joseph Conrad novel he is reading “It’s not an adventure story, is it?” This is of course theoretically an action picture, but it’s an hour into the runtime before we get an action scene. Jackson doesn’t pull the cheap trick of manufacturing a fight or a chase simply to keep up the pace, instead managing to hold our interest with creeping tension and character development. When the action does come, Jackson proves his mastery at fashioning breathtaking sequences. There are some truly exhilarating moments, like when the camera moves in on Kong and the T-Rex for the climax of their battle. As in his earlier pictures, one of Jackson’s trademarks is little moments of comedy, most notably seen here in the dinosaur stampede. And when the middle hour of the picture becomes an almost non-stop action-fest, Jackson has the sense and inventiveness to give each sequence its own tone, even requesting an unusually somber bit of musical scoring for the insect pit. Incidentally, it’s a superb and sensitive score all round by James Newton Howard.
One thing that makes the 2005 King Kong special is its open tribute to its roots, not just the 1933 movie but 1930s Hollywood in general. Peter Jackson is very much a modern director on the surface, filling his movies with wall-to-wall CGI and two-second shots, but his understanding of his cinematic forebears underpins it all. There’s some sly mocking of the stars and scripting of the era but done so as to be a knowing wink to old-time movie fans. And, with its beautiful rhythm and epic scope, this is a version of a Hollywood classic that seems totally in love with the very essence of cinema.
My grade for King Kong: A+
Zane's take at the Cinema's 